Gerhard
Richter
There's a documentary, on Netflix, of the artist named Gerhard Richter. The
longer I watched the movie, the more I admired him. His
ability to play, see, and work with colors, is just as fascinating as
the way he prepares the space for his exhibition. I also deeply
respect his meticulous approach in producing his art.
During the film, Gerhard Richter explains that painting under
observation is the worst thing to do, “worst than being in a
hospital”. Although my skills and expertise in painting are
incomparable to those of Gerhard Richter, I can relate to this
statement. The feeling one gets when being watched is as if you were
completely exposed.
When the
question “what were you thinking, while you were making this
painting?” is asked to the artist, Gerhard Richter is at a loss of
words to answer. He describes that to explain a painting in words can
only be done with a limited choice. Painting in itself is a
completely different form of communicating your thoughts as a
painter. You don't know where or how the painting will turn out, you
just feel and know it. I have done quite a few of paintings now, yet,
it wasn't until recently I discovered what it meant to finish a
piece. I agree with Gerhard Richter when he describes his painting as
“fun for the moment”, meaning they may look good now, for a
couple of seconds, minutes, or even for a day. But then you take a
look at them later on, and know they still have a way to go to be
completely “mature”. Each painting may be done by the same
technique, but their process is uniquely applied to each, leaving
one-of-a-kind artworks.
I'd like
to believe Gerhard Richter and I have many similarities. From various
range of styles, to admiration in other media, and techniques, I
engross and can relate to the artists' mindset. The idea that, for a
couple of years, Richter only did paintings of the color grey is
thought-provoking. To someone who may not understand art, may
describe this avant-garde approach as “dense” and cliché. But
when you observe each canvas separately, or compare them to each
other, the now dried paint reveals a distinct story. It reminds me of
the idea that no two created paintings, even when the same color is
being used, will produce the same result. It furthermore demonstrates
that emotions and feelings overpower the outcome of a hand-made
product, such as a painting.
Gerhard
Richter's work is something I had never witnessed before. The artists
I have learned and seen work of, usually have techniques that is
quite opposed to Richter's. Although he is very precise in how he
works and what he expects his paintings to look like, Richter doesn't
truly control the paint he puts on canvas. By using a “squeegee”,
a sort of plastic palette knife that various in sizes, disconnect him
from the paint in some aspects. He may place the paint, and specific
color(s) on it with careful details, but the way the paint forms and
plays is truly due to the plastic and canvas relationship. Gerhard
Richter can just observe and 'feel' where it will take him.
What I
find the most incredible in Gerhard Richter's approach, is knowing he
started his carrer with surrealism. The transformation between the
two styles are quite compelling. Although most of his work now is
viewed as abstract, there is a sense of surrealism to them. Images
and landscapes begin to form from each painting. I believe that
because the paintings are so abstract, reflecting a unique
observation and perception on the image strictly differs by its
viewer. He described two paintings towards the beginning of the film,
where one was more “fun” than the other, but I couldn't help but
disagree with him. Gerhard Richter's work reminded me of the saying
“once a painting is hung for others to view, it no longer belongs
to the painter.”
No comments:
Post a Comment